Read more at source.
Read more at source.
Following the finalization of the rule, the alliance petitioned the NHTSA to reconsider it, asserting that the existing technology could not meet the high standards set by the regulation. They also claimed that their suggestions were dismissed during the rulemaking process. However, the NHTSA denied the petition, maintaining that the requirements were feasible and aimed at pushing the industry towards adopting new technology to ensure safety.
Despite the lawsuit, the auto alliance has made it clear that their litigation should not be interpreted as opposition to AEB or a lack of confidence in the technology. They have invested over a billion dollars in developing AEB and support its broadest possible deployment across the U.S. vehicle fleet. Their litigation is primarily about ensuring a rule that maximizes driver and pedestrian safety and is technologically feasible.
NHTSA acknowledged that the final rule is technology-forcing, but emphasized that the standard is practicable and no single current vehicle must meet every requirement for an FMVSS to be considered practicable under the Safety Act.